Daft Con
>> Monday, April 12, 2010
There have been many cons.
First there was consultant negotiating a contract to have a US law firm establish contact with the US authorities.
The PM hastily concocted a response in parliament, but later conceded that there indeed had been some contact but no contract.
But that response was un-convincing and there was a call for concrete evidence of the correction. Such proved controversial as glaring inconsistencies began to emerge.
The contrast with the Trafigura Affair has crossed the political Rubicon. The PM appears confused; Brady may confess; Vaz has been confined.
The saga continues. Read more...
First there was consultant negotiating a contract to have a US law firm establish contact with the US authorities.
The PM hastily concocted a response in parliament, but later conceded that there indeed had been some contact but no contract.
But that response was un-convincing and there was a call for concrete evidence of the correction. Such proved controversial as glaring inconsistencies began to emerge.
- Were the US authorities conned?
- Was there a conspiracy to deceive and defraud?
- Who will be convicted?
- Who will have to be consoled?
The contrast with the Trafigura Affair has crossed the political Rubicon. The PM appears confused; Brady may confess; Vaz has been confined.
The saga continues. Read more...
