Daft Con
>> Monday, April 12, 2010
There have been many cons.
First there was consultant negotiating a contract to have a US law firm establish contact with the US authorities.
The PM hastily concocted a response in parliament, but later conceded that there indeed had been some contact but no contract.
But that response was un-convincing and there was a call for concrete evidence of the correction. Such proved controversial as glaring inconsistencies began to emerge.
The contrast with the Trafigura Affair has crossed the political Rubicon. The PM appears confused; Brady may confess; Vaz has been confined.
The saga continues.
First there was consultant negotiating a contract to have a US law firm establish contact with the US authorities.
The PM hastily concocted a response in parliament, but later conceded that there indeed had been some contact but no contract.
But that response was un-convincing and there was a call for concrete evidence of the correction. Such proved controversial as glaring inconsistencies began to emerge.
- Were the US authorities conned?
- Was there a conspiracy to deceive and defraud?
- Who will be convicted?
- Who will have to be consoled?
The contrast with the Trafigura Affair has crossed the political Rubicon. The PM appears confused; Brady may confess; Vaz has been confined.
The saga continues.
2 comments:
Except for those humans born by c/section all others are born between urine and feaces. Does this make men in particular bloated with fluids or solids . Does this make men mediators or meditators, If solids is the factor , no wonder we have so much dispensed in the environment in the name of knowledege conspired with policies. The co-conspirators are going for the blind goal
Who are the three parties?
Could it be Golding, Vaz and Brady?
Bangarang!
Post a Comment