WOW

Have you ever had cause to wonder:

• Can there ever be a credible investigation into the links between crime and politics in Tivoli Gardens without any mention being made to the one Don - Edward Phillip George Seaga?
• Can there ever be a credible enquiry into the decision making processes of the PNP government 2004 without any insights provided by the Black Prince - P.J. Patterson?
• Is it realistic to expect that all members of any cabinet would have been made fully aware of the detials of national security initiatives when there have been allegations that some have been involved in drug trafficking, money laundering or even murder?
• Can we expect that "collective responsibility" requires that each and every cabinet minister is fully aware of that for which he has accepted responsibility; or does it mean that whatever decisions are made, he has to publicly support or tender his resignation?
• Can we expect the same level of confusion, waffling and inconsistency exhibited in the COE to find sanctuary in the final report?
• Do the terms of reference in the Manatt COE oblige the calling of Lorna Golding to elaborate on her intervention in the Dudus extradition affair?
• Is it still a figment of anybody's imagination that this COE will cost the taxpayers $40 million only?
• What factors could explain the absence at the COE of the Leader of the Opposition and the President of the PNP especially during Peter Phillips' testimony?
• Will PM Golding disclose the name(s) of the JLP donor(s) of US$50,000.00 for the hiring of MPP and produce the actual cheque to substantiate the claim?
• On hindsight would it have been a better political strategy to adopt the Brady approach and pay $500.00 than to have one's reputation savaged in public?
• In light of the legal wranglings and courtroom drama will there be a "reduced rate" for lawyers who have not performed on certain days?